THE NATURE OF THE PROVOS FUNCTION IN ENFORCING THE DISCIPLINARY LAW THE INDONESIANNATIONAL POLICE

Objective: The study seeks to explore the nature of the provost's role in disciplining Polri members, analyze the compliance of the provost function with Government Regulation Number 2 of 2003, and identify influential factors affecting its effectiveness.

Theoretical Framework: The research engages with Government Regulation Number 2 of 2003, providing the foundation for disciplinary enforcement within the Indonesian State Police. It incorporates theoretical perspectives on legal norms, disciplinary principles, and the pivotal role of the provost within the police structure.

Methodology: Combining qualitative research methods, the study employs sociological empirical analysis and normative research techniques. This approach facilitates a comprehensive examination of the gap between legal ideals and practical implementation within the context of disciplinary enforcement.

Results and Conclusion: Findings indicate intricate enforcement procedures, notably the requirement of Ankum's permission, contributing to inefficiencies in the provost's function. Factors influencing this role include legal substance, structural elements, facilities, cultural nuances, and the characteristics of Polri members. The study concludes by stressing the importance of professionalism within the provost function to ensure effective discipline among Polri members, thereby advocating adherence to regulations for the establishment of a disciplined police force.

Originality/Value: The research's uniqueness lies in its blended methodology, fusing sociological empirical and normative approaches. The study's findings hold significant value in shedding light on the challenges and recommendations for improving disciplinary enforcement mechanisms within the Indonesian State Police.